Concurrent inference demand
Drag to calculate a simple capacity estimate.
9
Estimated tokens per user/sec67
Illustrative 600 aggregate tokens/sec, evenly divided. Not a hardware benchmark.
ChatGPT GenUI-inspired demonstrations · October 2026
One page. Many interactive patterns.
A live, standalone showcase for testing what modern ChatGPT-style interactive responses could feel like inside Fibery Embed Views. Change any value below and watch the page respond.
18working UI examples
Important: This is an independently coded HTML/JavaScript recreation of interactive patterns, not exported native ChatGPT GenUI code. All data is fictional or demonstrative. Nothing is sent to a server, saved to Fibery or sent to another user. Public test URL; do not enter confidential information.
01 / Inputs and controls
The small components that make a response actionable.
Response priority
Choose a workload. Each button changes the recommendation.
Balanced queueA measured trade-off between latency and budget.
Hosting jurisdiction
Australian regionPrivacy, support and latency requirements should be verified before deployment.
Release readiness
Tick off acceptance criteria to update the readiness meter.
Readiness25%
Safe-mode controls
Require human approval
Show or hide the approval step.
Approval gate activeConsequential actions pause for a reviewer.
Risk tolerance
Dedicated boundaries selected.
Planning date
Sunday, 1 November 2026Displayed immediately in the browser's timezone.
Scenario stepper
Add or remove simulated companies.
3
companies · 27 users
Each simulated company has nine registered staff.
Personalised output
Hello, collaborator!The preview reacts immediately to your input.
02 / Charts and structured data
Visuals that respond to user decisions, rather than staying static.
Illustrative traffic by provider
Scale the sample data
MonTueWedThuFri
Synthetic traffic; not real provider data.
Capacity allocation
65%
Interactive workload
Remainder reserved for background jobs.
Sample pipeline comparison
Click a column title to sort
All table values are invented to illustrate filtering and sorting.
What-if budget
$133per user
$3.6kper quarter
$14kper year
Component explorer
03 / Workflow interactions
Small self-contained processes that feel closer to a real app.
Move a review card
Advance or reset a card between stages. Changes stay in the page.
01 / Research
02 / Review
03 / Ready
Stage 1 of 3
Quick experiment brief
Submissions aren't sent anywhere.
Draft note
0 / 250
PreviewYour note will appear here.
Implementation decision FAQ
Can Fibery store values changed in this showcase?
Not yet. This is a static client-side test. Persisting data requires a separate API integration, permissions and a data model.
Is this native ChatGPT GenUI?
No. It recreates common interaction patterns as standard HTML, CSS and JavaScript so the same behaviour can be hosted and embedded elsewhere.
Will the page work without third-party CDNs?
Yes. It has no JavaScript libraries, fonts, trackers or network calls. The only dependency is a modern browser with JavaScript enabled.
Can it be used privately?
Yes, in a future deployment behind Cloudflare Access or authenticated app hosting. This current public URL should contain sample data only.
04 / Save a scenario in Fibery
Turn interactive choices into structured Fibery records — native Form proof of concept.
Your live snapshot
This preview reads the controls you've changed throughout this gallery. It's a separate capture demonstration, not a background tracker.
Save opens the public Fibery Form with your current scenario values prefilled for review. Nothing is sent until you press Submit in Fibery. All demo submissions are publicly visible.
Proof of data capture
The native form writes fields into the public Scenario Submissions database rather than collecting unstructured notes.
View results in FiberyIn the public demo sidebar, choose “03 Submitted Scenario Data”. The sample system test row is seeded; external form submission has not yet been independently tested.
⚠ All entities here are public. Don't enter personal details, credentials, customer information, or confidential business data.
For the Fibery review
Questions worth exploring with an implementation partner.
Iframe renderingMobile layoutsKeyboard accessibilityApp permissionsPersisted scenario stateFibery API integrationTenant access isolation
Suggested test: open this page both directly in a browser and within the Fibery Embed View. Compare desktop, Android, light/dark mode, inputs, copy to clipboard and state handling. The practical next stage would be a properly authenticated app and controlled Fibery data writes, not adding more decorative widgets.